One year ago, the situation was utterly separate. Ahead of the US presidential election, thoughtful citizens could acknowledge America's significant faults – its inequities and disparity – but they could still identify it as the US. A free society. A land where the rule of law held significance. A state led by a dignified and ethical official, even with his elderly years and declining health.
Nowadays, this autumn, many of us barely recognize the country we inhabit. Individuals believed to be undocumented migrants are rounded up and shoved into vehicles, at times blocked from fair treatment. The East Wing of the presidential residence – is being destroyed for an obscene ballroom. The leader is harassing his political rivals or supposed enemies and requesting legal authorities transfer an enormous amount of taxpayer money. Armed military personnel are deployed to US urban areas under fabricated reasons. The military command, rebranded the War Department, has – in effect – rid itself of routine media oversight during its expenditure of possibly reaching almost one trillion dollars in public funds. Colleges, attorney offices, journalism organizations are yielding from leader's menaces, and wealthy elites are handled as members of the royal family.
“America, just months before its 250-year mark as the planet's foremost free society, has tipped over the limit into authoritarianism and totalitarianism,” a noted author, stated this past summer. “In the end, more quickly than I imagined possible, it did happen in this country.”
Each day begins to new horrors. It is hard to comprehend – and painful to realize – how severely declined we have become, and how quickly it unfolded.
However, we understand that Trump was properly voted in. Even after his highly troubling first term and even after the warnings associated with the understanding of Project 2025 – despite Trump himself stated openly he would act as an autocrat solely at the start – sufficient voters chose him instead of the other candidate.
Frightening as today's circumstances are, it's more frightening to realize that we have only been nine months into this administration. Where will another 36 months of this decline leave us? And suppose the three years transforms into an prolonged era, because there is no one to stop this leader from determining that a third term is required, maybe for security concerns?
Granted, not everything is hopeless. There are legislative votes next year which might establish an alternate balance of power, if Democrats regain either chamber of Congress. We have elected officials who are trying to exert a degree of oversight, such as representatives that are initiating an inquiry regarding the effort to cash appropriation from legal authorities.
And a national vote in the next cycle could initiate our journey to recovery just as last year’s election placed us on this unfortunate course.
We see countless citizens marching in the streets of their cities, like they performed in the past days during anti-authority protests.
An ex-cabinet member, stated lately that “the dormant powerhouse of America is awakening”, just as it did after the Communist witch-hunt era in the 1950s or throughout the Vietnam war protests or in the Watergate scandal.
In those instances, the listing ship ultimately corrected itself.
The author states he recognizes the indicators of that revival and notices it unfolding at present. As support, he cites the large-scale demonstrations, the broad, bipartisan pushback against a broadcaster's firing and the near-unanimous rejection by reporters to agree to military mandates they only publish what is sanctioned.
“The dormant force always remains dormant until specific greed grows too toxic, an specific act so offensive of societal benefit, some brutality so loud, that he has no choice but to awaken.”
It's a positive outlook, and I appreciate Reich’s experienced view. Maybe he’ll turn out correct.
Meanwhile, the crucial issues persist: will the nation regain its footing? Can it retrieve its standing in the world and its commitment to the rule of law?
Or should we recognize that the historical project succeeded temporarily, and then – abruptly, completely – collapsed?
My negative thoughts indicates that the second option is true; that everything could be finished. My hopeful heart, though, tells me that we have to attempt, in whatever ways possible.
In my case, as a media critic, that’s about encouraging reporters to live up, more thoroughly, to their mission of overseeing leadership. For some people, it might involve working on congressional campaigns, or organizing rallies, or discovering methods to protect voting rights.
Under twelve months back, we were in a very different place. A year from now? Or in several years? The reality is, we cannot predict. Our sole course is try to continue fighting.
The contact I have in the classroom with new media professionals, who are both visionary and grounded, {always
A tech enthusiast and journalist with over a decade of experience covering emerging technologies and digital transformations.
Michael Hunter
Michael Hunter
Michael Hunter
Michael Hunter