Arriving this weekend is James Bond Day, for those who didn't know – 5 October is recognized as a international observance focused on everything about 007, due to this being the anniversary of the global debut of the inaugural 007 movie, with Sean Connery, in the year 1962. Consider it as a bit like May the 4th, but with less furry aliens and an abundance of sophisticated style.
Yet this time around, the coming of the 007 celebration seems somewhat underwhelming. Not long has passed after the filmmaker was confirmed to direct the upcoming 007 movie earlier this year, and even less time since Peaky Blinders’ Steven Knight was brought on board to draft the story. But there’s been almost no indication from that point of the new 007 actually being revealed, and even less sense concerning the path this long-running series will proceed. The only information are unconfirmed reports from entertainment outlets implying that the film-makers intend to cast a fairly young Brit, who could be from a diverse background but is not going to be a woman, a big-name celebrity, or somebody slightly known.
Undoubtedly, this represents disappointing news for the many gambling platforms which have making a pretty penny over recent months out of trying to convince bettors that the competition is between Callum Turner, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Henry Cavill, Theo James, Leo Woodall plus the charismatic star from Saltburn who is actually Australian.
Intriguingly, the last time the movie franchise chose a complete unknown occurred in 1969, as George Lazenby temporarily assumed the iconic pistol. Earlier, Connery himself certainly wasn’t a star: he had had several supporting roles and done a bit of stage and modelling work in addition to working in fitness and milk delivery in his hometown before landing the starring part in the debut movie. The film's producers deliberately avoided an established star; they sought an unfamiliar performer whom audiences would accept as the actual character, rather than as a performer portraying Bond.
Employing this strategy again may end up as a clever decision, similar to how it worked back in the sixties.
But getting Villeneuve involved means that there's no room for error whatsoever should the next 007 ends up as unconvincing. Amplifying the ridiculous devices and innuendo is no longer an option with a director like is a serious filmmaker specializing in cinematic genres renowned for thoughtful science fiction where the dominant feature is deep philosophical tension.
An aggressive type in black tie … Daniel Craig in 2006’s Casino Royale.
Nevertheless, in many ways, hiring Villeneuve provides clear signals that are essential about the new post-Daniel Craig direction. We won't see any invisible cars or sexual innuendos, and it's doubtful we'll see Sheriff JW Pepper back any time soon. All of this is, naturally, absolutely fine for those who prefer your James Bond contemporary in style. However, it leaves unclear how Villeneuve’s take of the elegant government hitman will be unique compared to previous Bonds that came before him particularly should the next chapter opts not to set the narrative in the initial decades.
Craig was instantly distinctive as a different type of stylish operative upon his debut in the franchise in Casino Royale from 2006, an aggressive figure in black tie who would never be seen with ridiculous gadgets, or using sexual wordplay with Denise Richards while handling explosives. He caused Brosnan's tech-dependent charmer which recently had been considered by some the top 007 after Connery, look like an imitation Connery overheated and ruined. This pattern is familiar. After Connery came Lazenby, Brosnan followed the overlooked Dalton, and cheesy late-era Roger Moore came after the intense early Moore. Every era of 007 redefines the last one, however, every version remains in their own way the iconic spy, worthy of celebration. It’s just a little weird, as we apparently celebrate the current 007 Day, that we are being invited to honor a character who doesn’t even exist yet.
A tech enthusiast and journalist with over a decade of experience covering emerging technologies and digital transformations.
Michael Hunter
Michael Hunter
Michael Hunter
Michael Hunter
Michael Hunter